Skip to content Skip to footer
Enquiries Call 0345 209 1000

The original National Procurement Policy Statement (NPPS) has now been withdrawn and the Procurement Act’s commencement delayed until 24 February next year.

For contracting authorities deciding whether to go ahead with a planned procurement now, or to delay under after 24 February, a real challenge is not knowing when the new NPPS will be available: section 13(9) requires contracting authorities to “have regard to” the NPPS. Which is impossible for the time being as the NPPS doesn’t currently exist.

The Act also requires there to be a consultation on the replacement NPPS (whenever that might be ready) and for it to be approved by Parliament. Factor in Christmas holidays, and it’s easy to see how planning for a spring 2025 procurement has suddenly become very challenging. 

It is crucial that the new regime in the Procurement Act goes live with a bold and ambitious Statement that drives delivery of the Government’s missions, and therefore, I am proposing a short delay to the commencement of the Act to February 2025 so this work can be completed.

https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2024-09-12/hcws90

Latest insights, news & views

Construction

High Court hands down major ruling on Building Liability Orders

The High Court has delivered an important judgment in Crest Nicholson v Ardmore, confirming the expanding reach of the Building Safety Act 2022 (“BSA”) and the circumstances in which Building Liability Orders (“BLOs”) will be made against associated companies.
Read more on High Court hands down major ruling on Building Liability Orders

Clarke Willmott announces 2026 promotions

In total 21 lawyers have been promoted across the firm’s regional offices, with the announcement including five individuals due to become partners, nine new senior associates and seven new associates.
Read more on Clarke Willmott announces 2026 promotions
Commercial contracts and agreements

The brand you sell can come back to bite warning

Leading national law firm Clarke Willmott LLP has described the legal dispute between Jo Malone and Estée Lauder as ‘a cautionary tale’, warning that selling the rights to a founder’s name can carry decades-long consequences.
Read more on The brand you sell can come back to bite warning

Looking for legal advice?