Skip to content Skip to footer
Enquiries Call 0800 652 8025
Steelworker

Clarke Willmott backs findings of British Steel Pensions poll

Our Financial Litigation team who are seeking compensation for victims of the British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS) mis-selling scandal have welcomed the results of a poll that says the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) should not be tasked with providing a guaranteed income for those affected.

Almost two-thirds (62 per cent) of respondents to a survey by Pensions Buzz disagreed the PPF should be the body to provide affected steelworkers with a guaranteed income similar to the amount they would have received had they not transferred out of the fund in the 2017 scandal.

The poll follows calls by the Personal Investment Management & Financial Advice Association for BSPS members to be compensated through the PPF.

Damian Pitts, senior associate, who represents more than 1,000 steelworkers, said: “We agree with the view of most of the respondents to the Pension Buzz survey that the PPF should not be the body to compensate affected steelworkers.

“If properly advised, most of the steelworkers would have joined the replacement scheme, BSPS2, rather than remain in their existing pension which was likely at the time to enter the Pension Protection Fund (PPF).

“The benefits steelworkers would receive from BSPS2 are greater (in most circumstances) than the PPF so suggesting those same steelworkers should now be compensated by the PFF would leave the majority of steelworkers undercompensated again.

“In any event, the old BSPS has now exited its PPF assessment period and is working towards a scheme buy-out, so even those steelworkers who should have been advised to remain in the old BSPS would not be adequately compensated by the PPF.”

In the Pension Buzz survey, 25 per cent of pundits agreed the PPF should pay out for victims, while 13 per cent were unsure.

Meanwhile, our team is warning steelworkers eligible to claim compensation to act before time runs out.  The period during which steelworkers can claim against bad advice to transfer out of their pension schemes is coming to an end for many this year.

To date, Clarke Willmott has recovered more than £5 million in compensation for around 1,000 steelworkers affected in Teesside, Scunthorpe, Middlesbrough, and South Wales. We have put together a dedicated team to help with the cases.

The team provides free initial consultations to discuss transfers, with no obligation.

More than 8,000 steelworkers representing around 18 per cent of eligible members and £2.8 billion of the fund transferred from the old BSPS. Meanwhile 95 per cent of transfers came on the back of financial advice received from a Financial Conduct Authority-regulated firm and prior to the ban on contingent charging.

Posted:

Your key contact

Damian Pitts

Partner

London
Damian is an experienced litigator in the financial services litigation team who is able to get positive results in a wide range of financial disputes on behalf of both private individuals and financial advice firms.
View profile for Damian Pitts >

More on this topic

Industry news

Court of Appeal allows secret commissions claim to proceed as a representative action

The Court of Appeal in Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP & Another [2024] EWCA Civ 9 has upheld a High Court’s decision permitting a secret commission claim to proceed as a representative action under CPR 19.8 in an important decision for the “opt out” collective action regime in England and Wales.
Read more on Court of Appeal allows secret commissions claim to proceed as a representative action
Financial services litigation

Service of a claim by email – time for a change in the rules?

In Chehaib v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Others [2024] EWHC 2 the claimant failed to have its claim survive against one of three defendants after attempting to serve that defendant by email without permission contrary to CPR Practice Direction 6A.
Read more on Service of a claim by email – time for a change in the rules?

Looking for legal advice?