Skip to content Skip to footer
Enquiries Call 0800 652 8025
Two professionals reviewing a contract

Is your contract frustrated?

The law of frustration is a common law doctrine which operates outside of binding contracts. A contract may be frustrated if, owing to an unforeseen event, it becomes impossible to perform. It may also be frustrated if performance of the contractual obligations becomes radically different as a result of the unforeseen event. As such in the right circumstances the coronavirus pandemic may result in the frustration of a contract.

If your contract contains a force majeure clause, a clause which deals with unforeseen events, the doctrine of frustration is unlikely to apply. This will however be a matter of interpretation and legal advice should be sought.

The effect of frustration is to discharge the parties from all future obligations. In circumstances such as the current pandemic, this will be pleasing to hear for many suppliers and businesses whom find themselves unable to deliver and exposed to claims for compensation, however caution must be taken as raising frustration in the wrong circumstances could result in you being in breach of contract.

It also provides a statutory right to recover payments made before the frustrating event, but only to the extent that such payments have not been used by the receiving party in the performance of its obligations prior to the frustrating event. For example, a deposit on account of future performance may be recoverable in the event that the contract is frustrated prior to the date of performance. However, credit may have to be given if part of that deposit has been used to pay for goods required for the future performance.

In the coming months and years the courts will be tasked with considering whether contracts have been frustrated as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. The reality is that each case will rest on an individual analysis of the particular contractual obligations and the actual effect of the pandemic on those obligations. Courts do not interfere with binding contracts unnecessarily and therefore caution should be adopted before wielding the sword of frustration.

We highly recommend that you seek legal advice in respect of each specific contract that has been affected by the coronavirus pandemic before acting.

Posted:

Your key contact

More on this topic

Commercial litigation and disputes

Can you get judgment early in an unfair prejudice petition?

Are you a shareholder feeling sidelined by your company’s management? The Companies Act 2006 offers a lifeline through an unfair prejudice petition which enables shareholders to seek court intervention when their interests are unfairly harmed.
Read more on Can you get judgment early in an unfair prejudice petition?
Commercial litigation and disputes

Stopping a SLAPP

A SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) is the abuse of the litigation process to stifle legitimate freedom of expression.
Read more on Stopping a SLAPP
Commercial litigation and disputes

Important Judgment Made for COVID-19 Business Interruption Cases

A recent Court of Appeal judgment made in the landmark ‘Excel case’ which centres around Covid-19 related business interruption coverage, could have wider implications for other businesses affected by loss during the pandemic.
Read more on Important Judgment Made for COVID-19 Business Interruption Cases
Commercial litigation and disputes

How manufacturers can terminate commercial contracts successfully

As litigation solicitors who specialise in the manufacturing sector, we are often approached by clients at the end of a commercial relationship asking how they can terminate a contract with the minimum legal consequences.
Read more on How manufacturers can terminate commercial contracts successfully

Looking for legal advice?